In most of these shows that feature skirts or dresses, the designers just don't seem to get it right. Too many mixed messages: there are pants underneath, heavy boots for footwear, thick socks (usually knee high), heavy, boxy tops many of them long. It’s like the designer is saying “even though it’s a skirt, we’re still conforming to the binary. Get rid of the clunky-chunky and get something lighter and more flowing and expressive. Add some air and freedom to the expression..
I agree, anonymous. But still, it is a nice first step towards fashion freedom. Anyways, "clunky-chunky", or rather certain punk-like quality, may be one just of Juel Larsen's traits, both with skirts or pants... and not only in menswear.
Many of the creations are somewhat exagerated, ok, but basically I like the skirts (I hope they are not shorts)combined with the knee socks in the pictures #3 and #11. Even the dress/shorts combo, pic #1, does not look too femme.
In most of these shows that feature skirts or dresses, the designers just don't seem to get it right. Too many mixed messages: there are pants underneath, heavy boots for footwear, thick socks (usually knee high), heavy, boxy tops many of them long. It’s like the designer is saying “even though it’s a skirt, we’re still conforming to the binary. Get rid of the clunky-chunky and get something lighter and more flowing and expressive. Add some air and freedom to the expression..
ReplyDeleteI agree, anonymous. But still, it is a nice first step towards fashion freedom. Anyways, "clunky-chunky", or rather certain punk-like quality, may be one just of Juel Larsen's traits, both with skirts or pants... and not only in menswear.
ReplyDeleteMany of the creations are somewhat exagerated, ok, but basically I like the skirts (I hope they are not shorts)combined with the knee socks in the pictures #3 and #11. Even the dress/shorts combo, pic #1, does not look too femme.
ReplyDelete